http://imanaturalblond.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] imanaturalblond.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] fandomhigh2006-04-12 04:11 pm

Journalistic Integrity (Wednesday, April 12 - 6th period)

Students will find copies of the last three editions of the school paper on their desks.

"Afternoon," Rita said genially. "Take a look at the paper, boys and girls. I'd like you all to find something in the context of the paper that you see as bad journalism, based on what we've covered this term. Bias, lack of context or clarification, and so on. Set to it."
fh_jackass: Logan Echolls (Default)

Re: OOC

[personal profile] fh_jackass 2006-04-12 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)
[If you feel it's good journalism, can't you argue that IC?]

Re: OOC

[identity profile] marsheadtilt.livejournal.com 2006-04-12 09:31 pm (UTC)(link)
[my argument has nothing to do with if its good or bad journalism -- it's an issue of respect for those of us who take the time to write for the paper. I, as a player, feel that I deserve the respect of being asked before something I wrote is trashed in game, just like it was an issue of respect when you talked to me about Logan's nightmare and I gave you the heads up on V & Bel's meeting.]

Re: OOC

[identity profile] marsheadtilt.livejournal.com 2006-04-12 10:00 pm (UTC)(link)
[well, I suppose it depends on what's being criticized. if you're going to criticize the content, that would be an ic thing - but if you're criticizing grammar, etc? that's more ooc, in my opinion. I realize that this is a very IC assignment for Rita to give though :)]
fh_jackass: Logan Echolls (Default)

Re: OOC

[personal profile] fh_jackass 2006-04-12 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)
[ooc: I disagree. If you put something out there for the public to react to, especially something as inflammatory as Phoebe's editorial today, then you can't expect to control their reactions.

Besides, it's *Rita*. It's not like she's got a lot of credibility on the matter.