endsthegame (
endsthegame) wrote in
fandomhigh2016-08-08 07:04 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Practical Philosophy, Monday
"It's been a quiet week," Ender said, "But for the market. It's left me thinking about an old class topic: our judgment of others, and what it means."
He took a swig from a bottle of water. "It's the idea of judging people that drove the human philosophers of old into endless debates, on when it was okay to judge something terrible or evil. They developed extensive theories on what made something good and right. Take the old Greek philosophers such as Socrates and Aristotle, who believed in what's called 'virtue ethics' - the idea that the character of the person defines the morality of his actions. Socrates argued, for instance, that if a person knew what was right, then he would do right. It was only not knowing what 'good' was that might cause someone to do evil."
"Then there were the stoics, who believed virtue laid in contentment, in being happy with what you're given, whatever it was. Opposite them, the hedonists, who believed 'good' was anything that made you feel happy. Later philosophers came up with the theory of consequentialism, the idea that your morality depends on the consequences of what you does. Some philosophers felt that good deeds were only good if they worked to better the country, for instance. On the other hand, deontologists such as Kant believed that goodness came from doing, and the reasons someone might have to do something. If you were doing something out of duty, for instance, then according to Kant, you were doing some good. 'Nothing in the world can possibly be conceived which could be called good without qualification except a good will.' Your intentions are what make you good."
He sat back.
"As I said, we all make our judgments. Of ourselves, of the people around us, of their pasts - especially around here. On what do you base your judgments? I think most of us realize that there is no such thing as pure good and evil - but how we judge other people tends to depend a lot on what we were taught and where we come from."
Another faint smile.
"I personally believe that character is important," he said. "Once you try to understand what makes people do what they do, it becomes that much harder to see them as evil. After all, most of us do what we think is right, even if our ideas of what right is are different. And in doing these things, we inspire other people to act in their own way."
He took a swig from a bottle of water. "It's the idea of judging people that drove the human philosophers of old into endless debates, on when it was okay to judge something terrible or evil. They developed extensive theories on what made something good and right. Take the old Greek philosophers such as Socrates and Aristotle, who believed in what's called 'virtue ethics' - the idea that the character of the person defines the morality of his actions. Socrates argued, for instance, that if a person knew what was right, then he would do right. It was only not knowing what 'good' was that might cause someone to do evil."
"Then there were the stoics, who believed virtue laid in contentment, in being happy with what you're given, whatever it was. Opposite them, the hedonists, who believed 'good' was anything that made you feel happy. Later philosophers came up with the theory of consequentialism, the idea that your morality depends on the consequences of what you does. Some philosophers felt that good deeds were only good if they worked to better the country, for instance. On the other hand, deontologists such as Kant believed that goodness came from doing, and the reasons someone might have to do something. If you were doing something out of duty, for instance, then according to Kant, you were doing some good. 'Nothing in the world can possibly be conceived which could be called good without qualification except a good will.' Your intentions are what make you good."
He sat back.
"As I said, we all make our judgments. Of ourselves, of the people around us, of their pasts - especially around here. On what do you base your judgments? I think most of us realize that there is no such thing as pure good and evil - but how we judge other people tends to depend a lot on what we were taught and where we come from."
Another faint smile.
"I personally believe that character is important," he said. "Once you try to understand what makes people do what they do, it becomes that much harder to see them as evil. After all, most of us do what we think is right, even if our ideas of what right is are different. And in doing these things, we inspire other people to act in their own way."
Sign In!
Re: Sign In!
Re: Sign In!
Re: Sign In!
Re: Sign In!
Listen to the Lecture
Talk.
Re: Talk.
And Peridot really, really preferred her logic and reason.
"But... I do look at whether or not something is logical. Logic is important."
Re: Talk.
Yeah, he wasn't surprised.
Re: Talk.
"I did have a disagreement with a Jasper about our respective priorities on a mission, and her actions were directly responsible for the destruction of our ship and my being stranded here. But the Jasper's goals were irrelevant to the mission at hand. I don't believe they accurately reflect Homeworld's wishes."
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
Completely unrelated.
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
"I can guess. Those enemies cost Homeworld a great deal, thousands of Earth's years ago. Jasper recognized one in particular. I believe she felt a... grudge. And then she decided to override my mission in the name of revenge."
Costing them everything.
Re: Talk.
Ender picked up a bottle of water.
Look, he could tell how Peridot felt about that. Didn't mean she didn't need to talk about it.
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
RE: Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
RE: Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
RE: Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
RE: Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
RE: Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
RE: Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
RE: Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
RE: Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
RE: Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
RE: Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
RE: Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
RE: Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
Who knew very much what she was referring to.
Re: Talk.
The vast experience of being 16, yeah.
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
Calm down a bit there, Hot Topic.
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
Re: Talk.
Talk to the Teacher
OOC