http://professor-lyman.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] professor-lyman.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] fandomhigh2007-01-18 06:04 pm
Entry tags:

US Government [Friday, January 19, 1st period]

Josh was leafing through an old copy of the Congressional Record (because he's a dork like that) and mainlining coffee (because it was ridiculously early) when his government class arrived.

"Okay, before I can bore you all with American government, I need to give you some quick background." He clasped his hands together. "Prepare to be bored by Greek, Roman and early English government."

He looked over the class. "This'll be on the test, though, so don't get so bored you're not taking notes, or are drooling all over them or something. I also have pretty decent aim with a wadded-up piece of paper and absolutely no problem in throwing one at you."

He consulted his notes, then wrote DEMOCRACY on the board in bold strokes. "The word democracy comes from the Greek roots 'demos-' meaning 'people' and '-kratia' meaning 'rule.' In Greek democracy, political power wasn't concentrated in the hands of a small group of people, but among all of them." Josh raised an eyebrow. "If your definition for 'people' was 'free adult males,' of course." He looked down at the papers in his hands. "Okay. The main legislative body, the Assembly, was made up of no less than the first 6,000 citizens that showed up at the meeting. Jury duty was considered an honor, not a pain in the ass, and being a member in most other civic institutions, including the Supreme Court, was chosen by lot." He looked around the room. "Take a minute and imagine some of your family members, or people in this classroom, with the authority to be the ultimate arbiters of justice on some of the cases the Supreme Court has to decide and you'll see why the Greek system might have a few kinks in it.

"The Romans took the Greek system of direct democracy and modified it into a representative democracy, which at first glance seems a lot like the system currently in place in the United States. The Founders of this country borrowed heavily from the Roman system, implementing its bicameral--two chambered--legislature and its system of groups of people voting for one person to represent them, rather than the direct democracy the Greeks used. We also yoinked most of their legal system, especially the codification of concepts like equal protection, innocent until proven guilty, and the right to confront your accuser."

He put the notes down. "The Roman Republic eventually gave way to the Roman Empire, which, while incredibly powerful and terribly, terribly interesting, wasn't a democratic government and so we will skip it."

He sighed and ran a hand through his hair. "I'm also, I'm pretty sure, required by law to mention that the Magna Carta--the piece of paper that nobles in England forced King John to sign that codified that no man, not even a king, is above the law--was signed in 1215." He looked at them. "So write it down. I'm definitely sure I have to ask you about that later.

"Almost done. I promise. Okay, the last piece of the puzzle was the Enlightenment. The 17th and 18th Centuries produced a bunch of prominent thinkers--you've heard of them--Locke, Hobbes, those guys--theorizing that there was a social contract between the rulers and those they governed, with terms that were binding on both sides. Of course at the time, countries were ruled by monarchs who weren't terribly anxious to implement these theories, as you might imagine.

"The 1500s and the first half of the 1600s in Europe were pretty much non-stop religious wars. After the political situation stabilized, there was a growing thought that maybe listening to only the churches--which were still very busy damning the other side to hell for their beliefs--to discover and understand, you know, all human knowledge was a bit of a bad idea. The Enlightenment began as a belief in a rational, orderly and comprehensible universe. And then the philosophers began wondering if the universe could be comprehensible, why couldn't governments make sense, too?"

Finally he looked up from his notes. "Everyone still awake? Or mostly? Great. In John Locke's Second Treatise on Government, he claims that by the 'law of nature', every individual has the right to punish those who cause wrongful injury to their life, liberty or property." He looked up. "This might sound terribly familiar for any of you who have ever heard the line in the Declaration of Independence that claims, among other self-evident truths, our unalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.""

He grinned. "But we'll get to that next week.

"No homework tonight, but I want you to divide up into groups of two or three and discuss this question: Is direct democracy practical today? In a nation of almost 300 million people, is it possible to simultaneously gather all of their opinions? Also, who's cooler: Calvin or Hobbes?"

Yeah, he meant the comic strip. Josh was occasionally very, very odd.

[OOC: Up early because of work internetlessness of doom. Have fun!]

Re: Pair up and talk about Calvin and Hobbes!

[identity profile] irulan-atreides.livejournal.com 2007-01-19 03:10 am (UTC)(link)
"Who are Calvin and Hobbes?" Irulan wondered aloud, she was from the future, far future, she hardly recognized anything the professor had mentioned.

Re: Pair up and talk about Calvin and Hobbes!

[identity profile] fat-halpert.livejournal.com 2007-01-20 01:51 am (UTC)(link)
"Calvin is an introspective little boy and Hobbes is his best friend, a giant anthropomorphic tiger who everyone else thinks is just a stuffed animal," Jim explained. "They're comic strip characters. Personally, Hobbes was the best."

Re: Pair up and talk about Calvin and Hobbes!

[identity profile] irulan-atreides.livejournal.com 2007-01-20 03:15 am (UTC)(link)
Irulan only stared at Jim, "A wha--?"

Re: Pair up and talk about Calvin and Hobbes!

[identity profile] fat-halpert.livejournal.com 2007-01-20 03:27 am (UTC)(link)
"Calvin had a habit of being kind of weird and daydreaming. Hobbes, on the other hand, was a master prankster and liked sleeping and eating stuff. He was ferocious but fun," Jim said.

Re: Pair up and talk about Calvin and Hobbes!

[identity profile] irulan-atreides.livejournal.com 2007-01-20 03:33 am (UTC)(link)
More blank staring, "Would I have hope of understanding this if I was not born and raised in this culture?"

Re: Pair up and talk about Calvin and Hobbes!

[identity profile] fat-halpert.livejournal.com 2007-01-20 03:42 am (UTC)(link)
"Only if you saw the comic strip in question," Jim said. "There are books. And you can find them online."

Re: Pair up and talk about Calvin and Hobbes!

[identity profile] irulan-atreides.livejournal.com 2007-01-20 03:43 am (UTC)(link)
"Online? Comics?" See, this was the reason why she should have taken Pop Culture in the first place.

Re: Pair up and talk about Calvin and Hobbes!

[identity profile] fat-halpert.livejournal.com 2007-01-20 03:50 am (UTC)(link)
"You need a tutor in the internet," Jim said. "Anyway, comics are little drawings that usually have a joke in them. They're highly entertaining. I recommend them."

Re: Pair up and talk about Calvin and Hobbes!

[identity profile] irulan-atreides.livejournal.com 2007-01-20 03:52 am (UTC)(link)
Irulan sighed. "Perhaps I do need a tutor in this arena, for all that our people share there are some glaring differences in our approach to everyday life."

Re: Pair up and talk about Calvin and Hobbes!

[identity profile] fat-halpert.livejournal.com 2007-01-20 04:06 am (UTC)(link)
"Apparently," Jim said. "Well, if you want any help with adjusting to my culture, I'm willing to lend a hand."

Re: Pair up and talk about Calvin and Hobbes!

[identity profile] irulan-atreides.livejournal.com 2007-01-20 04:22 am (UTC)(link)
Irulan smiled at Jim. "I gladly accept this lending hand."

Re: Pair up and talk about Calvin and Hobbes!

[identity profile] fat-halpert.livejournal.com 2007-01-20 04:33 am (UTC)(link)
"Cool," Jim said. "Want to meet up sometime early next week, get some of this culture and technology stuff squared away?"

Re: Pair up and talk about Calvin and Hobbes!

[identity profile] irulan-atreides.livejournal.com 2007-01-20 04:37 am (UTC)(link)
Irulan nodded, "Yes, that would be most helpful!"

Re: Pair up and talk about Calvin and Hobbes!

[identity profile] fat-halpert.livejournal.com 2007-01-20 04:39 am (UTC)(link)
"Cool," Jim said again. "Oh, and direct democracy is not practical. There are way too many people. And you'll learn this when I teach you about the internet, but many of them are insane and you probably don't want them having a direct say in your government."

Re: Pair up and talk about Calvin and Hobbes!

[identity profile] irulan-atreides.livejournal.com 2007-01-20 04:45 am (UTC)(link)
Personally, Irulan didn't think much of democracy and most of his reasons seem to support her perspective.

"That is indeed, very true, direct democracy will only lead to chaos and anarchy. Sometimes people need a firm hand."

Re: Pair up and talk about Calvin and Hobbes!

[identity profile] fat-halpert.livejournal.com 2007-01-20 04:50 am (UTC)(link)
"Or at least representatives who aren't as stupid as they seem," Jim said. He caught some C-SPAN earlier in the week when he wanted a nap. They did seem awfully stupid.

Re: Pair up and talk about Calvin and Hobbes!

[identity profile] irulan-atreides.livejournal.com 2007-01-20 04:52 am (UTC)(link)
"And a wise leader to guide them." Irulan said with a nod.

Re: Pair up and talk about Calvin and Hobbes!

[identity profile] fat-halpert.livejournal.com 2007-01-20 05:06 am (UTC)(link)
"That would probably help, yes," Jim said, not commenting on certain current leaders. "But that's the good thing about American democracy. Even if you get somebody unwise in there, the longest they can possibly rule is eight years."

Re: Pair up and talk about Calvin and Hobbes!

[identity profile] irulan-atreides.livejournal.com 2007-01-20 05:11 am (UTC)(link)
Irulan had to give it that, it would certainly lessen the damage done to an empire. "That, indeed is one of the benefits of democracy."