http://prof-methos.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] prof-methos.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] fandomhigh2006-01-12 12:22 pm

History of Medieval England - Thursday 6th Period: Discussion 1: Introduction and Pre-history to 500

Good afternoon, class. Now I get to torture you all by making you all stand up and introduce yourselves to your classmates. This is because I'm sadistic want to get you used to the concept of talking during our discussion sessions. Please give your name and what one thing you'd like to find out in this class.

Your homework, due next Tuesday but to be posted in this post is to pick a topic from the once-optional-now-mandatory reading list I gave you on Prehistoric Britain and Roman Britain and give me ETA a minimum of one hundred Wikipedia words on it. Got it? Good.

[[OOC comment threads are done!]]

[[ETA: OOC: At some point I stopped receiving comment notifications for this post. I'm scanning and trying to jump into discussions. But since I'm trying to foster discussion *amongst* all of you, I try not to jump in everywhere.]]

Re: DISCUSSION 2: Medieval English History: Roman Britain

[identity profile] cameronmitchell.livejournal.com 2006-01-12 09:58 pm (UTC)(link)
"Oh, that makes sense. Money usually figures into it somewhere. I'm not sure if the impressing worked a lot if they kept getting attacked regardless of the wall, though."

Re: DISCUSSION 2: Medieval English History: Roman Britain

[identity profile] notcalledlizzie.livejournal.com 2006-01-12 09:59 pm (UTC)(link)
"They also needed to awe the population on the south side," Elizabeth pointed out. "The further north they got, the more hostile people were and it's not changed omg."

Re: DISCUSSION 2: Medieval English History: Roman Britain

[identity profile] cameronmitchell.livejournal.com 2006-01-12 10:01 pm (UTC)(link)
"Right," Cameron nodded, "which Boudicca proved too. You're smart."

Re: DISCUSSION 2: Medieval English History: Roman Britain

[identity profile] mparkerceo.livejournal.com 2006-01-12 10:02 pm (UTC)(link)
"So," Parker said slowly, "it was a revenue maker, and a way to show the southern tribes, 'hey, we're doing something about those nuts in Scotland.' If that was the purpose, I guess it was more successful, since England remained more Romanized."

Re: DISCUSSION 2: Medieval English History: Roman Britain

[identity profile] notcalledlizzie.livejournal.com 2006-01-12 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)
"Well, yeah. The Scottish nuts were a threat to English tribes as well. The thing was, the Romans were good leaders. It helped unify all these tribes, and gave them something to strive for - Roman citizenship."

Re: DISCUSSION 2: Medieval English History: Roman Britain

[identity profile] mparkerceo.livejournal.com 2006-01-13 01:11 am (UTC)(link)
"Christianity wasn't a significant force in Rome until, what? The fourth century? Which was just about the time they lost contact with Britain on a regular basis," Parker said, thinking aloud. "How did Christianity get to Ireland, then? Leaving aside the Joseph of Arimathea story."