http://glasses-justice.livejournal.com/ (
glasses-justice.livejournal.com) wrote in
fandomhigh2010-02-16 01:42 pm
Entry tags:
Concepts of Justice and The Law [Period 4, Class #7, Feb 16]
"Today," Alex said, "I have good news, and not-so-good news. The bad news out of the way first: today you'll be having a midterm exam."
"The good news is: you may use any of the notes you've taken in class so far. You may use any resource you've brought in with you, for that matter, so long as you do not ask for help from your classmates. No talking to your neighbors, no passing notes, and absolutely no collaborating on answers." She stopped there to look around the room and be sure that the students knew she was taking that point seriously. "Back on the good news side: this is not a hard exam. I'm not asking you to define terms -- any of the terms I use, I defined myself. The point of this class isn't whether or not you can correctly tell me what 'mens rea' is -- it's whether or not you understand how to apply it."
Alex tapped the stack of papers on her desk. "So these questions are largely asking you to come up with arguments on certain topics -- the ones we've covered thus far in the semester. Give a reason for it, and then, since the legal system exists in gray areas, give a reason against it. Find one example that fits, and another that doesn't. I'm not going to grade these harshly. I want to see if we're all on the same page, or if I need to back up and recover some old ground."
"When you're finished, you can stay, or you can leave, but do not talk to your classmates, even if you've both completed your exams. It might distract those who are still taking it. Any questions?"
If there weren't any, then Alex was going to start passing out their tests.
"The good news is: you may use any of the notes you've taken in class so far. You may use any resource you've brought in with you, for that matter, so long as you do not ask for help from your classmates. No talking to your neighbors, no passing notes, and absolutely no collaborating on answers." She stopped there to look around the room and be sure that the students knew she was taking that point seriously. "Back on the good news side: this is not a hard exam. I'm not asking you to define terms -- any of the terms I use, I defined myself. The point of this class isn't whether or not you can correctly tell me what 'mens rea' is -- it's whether or not you understand how to apply it."
Alex tapped the stack of papers on her desk. "So these questions are largely asking you to come up with arguments on certain topics -- the ones we've covered thus far in the semester. Give a reason for it, and then, since the legal system exists in gray areas, give a reason against it. Find one example that fits, and another that doesn't. I'm not going to grade these harshly. I want to see if we're all on the same page, or if I need to back up and recover some old ground."
"When you're finished, you can stay, or you can leave, but do not talk to your classmates, even if you've both completed your exams. It might distract those who are still taking it. Any questions?"
If there weren't any, then Alex was going to start passing out their tests.

Sign In - JST07
Re: Sign In - JST07
Re: Sign In - JST07
Re: Sign In - JST07
Re: Sign In - JST07
Re: Sign In - JST07
Re: Sign In - JST07
Re: Sign In - JST07
Re: Sign In - JST07
Re: Sign In - JST07
Re: Sign In - JST07
Re: Sign In - JST07
Re: Sign In - JST07
Re: Sign In - JST07
Re: Sign In - JST07
Re: Sign In - JST07
Re: Sign In - JST07
Re: Sign In - JST07
Re: Sign In - JST07
Re: Sign In - JST07
During the Lecture - JST07
Re: During the Lecture - JST07
Re: During the Lecture - JST07
Re: During the Lecture - JST07
Re: During the Lecture - JST07
Probably.
Maybe.
Okay, probably not.
Re: During the Lecture - JST07
Midterm Exam - JST07
(This is where the sub-questions are going to go: I felt like nesting the OCD. As always, handwaving is totally fine.)
Question 1: Mens Rea and Intent - JST07
Re: Question 1: Mens Rea and Intent - JST07
If a person is of diminished mental capacity, it might be something to take into account despite said person committing a crime. Depending on the severity of the disability, they might not have known any better."
Re: Question 1: Mens Rea and Intent - JST07
Re: Question 1: Mens Rea and Intent - JST07
Re: Question 1: Mens Rea and Intent - JST07
Re: Question 1: Mens Rea and Intent - JST07
Re: Question 1: Mens Rea and Intent - JST07
Re: Question 1: Mens Rea and Intent - JST07
Re: Question 1: Mens Rea and Intent - JST07
Re: Question 1: Mens Rea and Intent - JST07
Question 2: The Adversarial System - JST07
Re: Question 2: The Adversarial System - JST07
Re: Question 2: The Adversarial System - JST07
Re: Question 2: The Adversarial System - JST07
Re: Question 2: The Adversarial System - JST07
Re: Question 2: The Adversarial System - JST07
Re: Question 2: The Adversarial System - JST07
Re: Question 2: The Adversarial System - JST07
Re: Question 2: The Adversarial System - JST07
Question 3: The Harm Principle (Victimless Crimes) - JST07
(Note: the latter are sometimes referred to as victimless crimes, a term which also came up during our discussion.)
Re: Question 3: The Harm Principle (Victimless Crimes) - JST07
Re: Question 3: The Harm Principle (Victimless Crimes) - JST07
Re: Question 3: The Harm Principle (Victimless Crimes) - JST07
Re: Question 3: The Harm Principle (Victimless Crimes) - JST07
Re: Question 3: The Harm Principle (Victimless Crimes) - JST07
Re: Question 3: The Harm Principle (Victimless Crimes) - JST07
Question 4: Case Study: Double Jeopardy
Give one argument for each side.
Re: Question 4: Case Study: Double Jeopardy
Re: Question 4: Case Study: Double Jeopardy
Re: Question 4: Case Study: Double Jeopardy
Re: Question 4: Case Study: Double Jeopardy
Re: Question 4: Case Study: Double Jeopardy
Re: Question 4: Case Study: Double Jeopardy
Question 5: Case Study - Capital Punishment
Give one argument for each side.
Re: Question 5: Case Study - Capital Punishment
Re: Question 5: Case Study - Capital Punishment
Re: Question 5: Case Study - Capital Punishment
Re: Question 5: Case Study - Capital Punishment
Re: Question 5: Case Study - Capital Punishment
Re: Question 5: Case Study - Capital Punishment
During the Exam: Talk to Alex - JST07
After the Exam: Talk to the TAs - JST07
Re: After the Exam: Talk to the TAs - JST07
Re: After the Exam: Talk to the TAs - JST07
After the Exam: Talk to Alex - JST07
Re: After the Exam: Talk to Alex - JST07
Re: After the Exam: Talk to Alex - JST07
Re: After the Exam: Talk to Alex - JST07
Re: After the Exam: Talk to Alex - JST07
Re: After the Exam: Talk to Alex - JST07
Re: After the Exam: Talk to Alex - JST07
Re: After the Exam: Talk to Alex - JST07
Re: After the Exam: Talk to Alex - JST07
Re: After the Exam: Talk to Alex - JST07
Re: After the Exam: Talk to Alex - JST07
Re: After the Exam: Talk to Alex - JST07
Re: After the Exam: Talk to Alex - JST07
Re: After the Exam: Talk to Alex - JST07
Re: After the Exam: Talk to Alex - JST07
Re: After the Exam: Talk to Alex - JST07
Re: After the Exam: Talk to Alex - JST07
Re: After the Exam: Talk to Alex - JST07
Re: After the Exam: Talk to Alex - JST07
Re: After the Exam: Talk to Alex - JST07
OOC - JST07
Oh, also! The case studies are taken from two SVU cases during Alex's tenure. Double jeopardy is "Rooftops," S3E4, and capital punishment is "Manhunt," S2E18.