atreideslioness: (House Atreides)
Ghanima Atreides ([personal profile] atreideslioness) wrote in [community profile] fandomhigh2013-01-28 11:27 am
Entry tags:

History of American Feminism, Monday, 2nd Period.

"We're going to jump a bit forward in time today," Ghanima said once everyone had arrived. "Title Nine is a portion of the Education Amendments of 1972, Public Law No. 92‑318, 86 Stat. 235, 23 June 1972, codified at 20 U.S.C. sections 1681 through 1688, U.S. legislation also identified its principal author's name as the Patsy Mink Equal Opportunity in Education Act. It states, in part, that 'No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.'"

"The first person to introduce Title IX in Congress was its author and chief Senate sponsor, Senator Birch Bayh of Indiana."

"At the time, Bayh was working on numerous constitutional issues related to women's rights, including the Equal Rights Amendment, to build "a powerful constitutional base from which to move forward in abolishing discriminatory differential treatment based on sex". As they were having some difficulty getting the ERA out of committee, the Higher Education Act of 1965 was on the floor for reauthorization, and on February 28, 1972, Senator Bayh introduced the ERA's equal education provision as an amendment."

"In his remarks on the Senate floor, Bayh said, "We are all familiar with the stereotype of women as pretty things who go to college to find a husband, go on to graduate school because they want a more interesting husband, and finally marry, have children, and never work again. The desire of many schools not to waste a 'man's place' on a woman stems from such stereotyped notions. But the facts absolutely contradict these myths about the 'weaker sex' and it is time to change our operating assumptions."

""While the impact of this amendment would be far-reaching", Bayh concluded, "it is not a panacea. It is, however, an important first step in the effort to provide for the women of America something that is rightfully theirs—an equal chance to attend the schools of their choice, to develop the skills they want, and to apply those skills with the knowledge that they will have a fair chance to secure the jobs of their choice with equal pay for equal work.""

"Title IX became law on June 23, 1972. When President Nixon signed the bill, he spoke mostly about desegregation busing, which was also a focus of the signed bill, but did not mention the expansion of educational access for women he had enacted."

"The legislation covers all educational activities, and complaints under Title IX alleging sex discrimination in fields such as science or math education, or in other aspects of academic life such as access to health care and dormitory facilities, are not unheard of. It also applies to non-sport activities such as school band and clubs; however, social fraternities and sororities, sex-specific youth clubs such as Girl Scouts and Boy Scouts, and Girls State and Boys State are specifically exempt from Title IX requirements."

[OOC: OCD is in the house! Sorry for the delay, it's ALA Awards Day. Please forgive any Twitter Spam that may happen today.]
arsenicmauls: (badass: upstanding)

Re: Sign-In

[personal profile] arsenicmauls 2013-01-28 05:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Gertrude Yorkes

Re: OOC

[identity profile] batwaffles.livejournal.com 2013-01-28 05:56 pm (UTC)(link)
sdfioaskl;jfasl;jfaskl; adfa TITLE IX I LOVE YOU <3 <3 <3 <3 <3
arsenicmauls: (neg: arms crossed)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] arsenicmauls 2013-01-28 06:01 pm (UTC)(link)
"I think it's a start, but if anyone thinks that actually stops girls from being excluded from activities based on bullshit excuses, they're on crack," Gert said. "All that means is that the guys are sneakier about it."

Re: Sign-In

[identity profile] batwaffles.livejournal.com 2013-01-28 06:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Stephanie Brown

Re: Sign-In

[identity profile] withasword.livejournal.com 2013-01-28 06:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Kate Daniels

Re: Sign-In

[identity profile] notacokeperson.livejournal.com 2013-01-28 06:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Karina Lyle

Re: Discussion

[identity profile] batwaffles.livejournal.com 2013-01-28 06:47 pm (UTC)(link)
"Oh, please," Stephanie said, rolling her eyes. "I mean, sure, sometimes men's sports programs get cut because there isn't room in the budget if they're going to be Title IX-compliant, but they at least existed, and I bet you anything that for every one that gets cut, there were at least ten women's sports programs that never got a chance to begin with. I mean, even at my old school, I was on the softball team and we had to work twice as hard doing fundraisers to support ourselves than the guys ever did. Why should the boys get to keep taking it for granted that any old macho-reaffirming activity they feel like taking up is going to, boom, automatically be there for them?"

. . . someone was a little bitter.
justbeingbay: ([neg] very solemn)

Re: Sign-In

[personal profile] justbeingbay 2013-01-28 08:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Bay Kennish
notalender: (fire)

Re: Sign-In

[personal profile] notalender 2013-01-28 08:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Arietty Clock
glacial_queen: (Craft Animated)

Re: Sign-In

[personal profile] glacial_queen 2013-01-29 12:06 am (UTC)(link)
Karla