chosehumanity (
chosehumanity) wrote in
fandomhigh2009-09-15 03:35 pm
Entry tags:
World Wars in the Media, Tuesday
"'The League of Nations could make no better investment than to buy up the master-print, reproduce it in every language, to be shown in all the nations until the word "war" is taken out of the dictionaries,'" Mitchell greeted them, once they'd entered. "Pretty big, idealistic words, but that's the hope of it. And that's what Variety said about the film we'll be talking about today-- Everything's Silent in the West. It's one of the most famous World War I films ever made. Or should I say, both of them? It was based on a book by Erich Maria Remarque -- that too probably took a different look at it."
"Stories change depending on what time they're told in, and by who. The original film, from 1930, was actually banned by the Nazis for being propaganda." He paused, and smirked for a moment at the class. "Think about that. The second, from 1979, gained no such bans - obviously - but it was also not nearly as well-received. They said it was sanitised, missing some of the point."
He pointed at the TV. "You'll be watching clips of both films today," he said, "I want you to tell me which differences you see in the message that's being put out. More than that, though, I want you to think about how you'd tell this story yourself." He lapsed into a quick summary of the tale, then added, "And nevermind yourself - how do you think people in this time would show it? What would they change? What would seem more important? What would seem less?"
He grinned. "Try and watch the whole films if you can," he said, "Or pick up the book. I'm told it's good for you, but I wouldn't want to encourage it. Might spite my reputation."
[[ ocd up! ]]
"Stories change depending on what time they're told in, and by who. The original film, from 1930, was actually banned by the Nazis for being propaganda." He paused, and smirked for a moment at the class. "Think about that. The second, from 1979, gained no such bans - obviously - but it was also not nearly as well-received. They said it was sanitised, missing some of the point."
He pointed at the TV. "You'll be watching clips of both films today," he said, "I want you to tell me which differences you see in the message that's being put out. More than that, though, I want you to think about how you'd tell this story yourself." He lapsed into a quick summary of the tale, then added, "And nevermind yourself - how do you think people in this time would show it? What would they change? What would seem more important? What would seem less?"
He grinned. "Try and watch the whole films if you can," he said, "Or pick up the book. I'm told it's good for you, but I wouldn't want to encourage it. Might spite my reputation."
[[ ocd up! ]]

Sign In
Listen to the Lecture
Watch the Clips/Discuss Them
Discuss
Talk to the TA
Talk to Mitchell
OOC
Re: Sign In
Re: Sign In
Re: Discuss
Thank you, Locke.
Re: Sign In
Re: Sign In
Re: Watch the Clips/Discuss Them
Re: Sign In
Re: Talk to the TA
She was considering withholding Mitchell's 'til he explained that doorman during Detention. What the heck was his deal?
Re: Listen to the Lecture
Re: Watch the Clips/Discuss Them
Re: Discuss
Re: Sign In
Re: Sign In
Re: Sign In
Re: Sign In
Re: Sign In
Re: Sign In