http://fandom-sub.livejournal.com/ (![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
fandom-sub.livejournal.com) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
fandomhigh2006-12-06 02:25 pm
fandom-sub.livejournal.com) wrote in fandomhigh2006-12-06 02:25 pm
Entry tags:
US Government [Wednesday, December 6, 4th Period]
"I'm Mrs. Krabappel, your substitute teacher. Professor Lyman is probably in therapy after having to deal with you all. Normally I teach 4th grade and that's bad enough. I couldn't imagine having to deal with teenagers on a regular basis. Ugh. Anyway, today's class is on the electoral college, but I don't care and they're paying me whether I teach you anything or not, so read your handout and answer this question."
She passed around the
Every state and the District of Columbia is worth a certain number of electoral votes, which are used--rather than a straight popular vote--to determine who becomes President. A state's electoral vote number is the combination of the number of representatives it has in Congress added to its two Senators. Every state, therefore, has at least 3 electoral votes. California, with the most population, has 55 electoral votes.
There are 538 electoral votes up for grabs--you need at least 270 of them to become President. In the history of the United States there have been four elections where the person who became President didn't also win the popular vote--1824, 1876, 1888 and 2000.
There is always someone trying to abolish the electoral college, and the debate both for and against it have been raging since roughly 1824. Proponents say that it requires candidates to spend time in states that they'd normally avoid--Iowa, for instance, or Michigan--and tailor their message to the entire country rather than focusing exclusively on California, Texas, and Florida, where the population is. Opponents say that with a winner-take-all distribution of electoral college votes--a candidate can win a state by 40 votes and still get all of the electoral votes--it disenfranchises the voters who cast ballots for the other guy. and wrote the question on the board.
Should the electoral college be abolished?
She passed around the
Every state and the District of Columbia is worth a certain number of electoral votes, which are used--rather than a straight popular vote--to determine who becomes President. A state's electoral vote number is the combination of the number of representatives it has in Congress added to its two Senators. Every state, therefore, has at least 3 electoral votes. California, with the most population, has 55 electoral votes.
There are 538 electoral votes up for grabs--you need at least 270 of them to become President. In the history of the United States there have been four elections where the person who became President didn't also win the popular vote--1824, 1876, 1888 and 2000.
There is always someone trying to abolish the electoral college, and the debate both for and against it have been raging since roughly 1824. Proponents say that it requires candidates to spend time in states that they'd normally avoid--Iowa, for instance, or Michigan--and tailor their message to the entire country rather than focusing exclusively on California, Texas, and Florida, where the population is. Opponents say that with a winner-take-all distribution of electoral college votes--a candidate can win a state by 40 votes and still get all of the electoral votes--it disenfranchises the voters who cast ballots for the other guy. and wrote the question on the board.
Should the electoral college be abolished?
Sign In
Talk
Talk to Mrs Krabappel
OOC
Re: Sign In
Re: Talk to Mrs Krabappel
Re: Talk to Mrs Krabappel
Re: Sign In
Re: Talk to Mrs Krabappel
Re: Sign In
Re: Sign In
Re: Sign In
Re: Talk
Re: Sign In
Re: Talk
Re: Talk to Mrs Krabappel
Re: Talk to Mrs Krabappel
Re: Sign In