http://professor-lyman.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] professor-lyman.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] fandomhigh2006-10-04 10:40 am

American Political Campaigning [Wednesday, October 4, 1st period]

Josh stopped watching the latest episode of The Daily Show on his laptop when the campaigning class walked into the classroom.

"Today we talk about targeting and research," he said. "As the dancing cartoons on Schoolhouse Rock used to say, 'knowledge is power', and this is never more true than in politics." He raised an eyebrow. "Schoolhouse Rock is awesome, and I refuse to hear anyone who says otherwise." He snapped his finger. "Eric, how many days until the election?"

He walked to the board. "Anyway. There are a few eternal truisms in campaigning," he began, ticking them off on his fingers, "If it's not on paper, it doesn't exist. There's no way to get more time. You only need 50 percent plus one vote to win. Josh Lyman is always right." He grinned at that last one. "Checking to see if you were paying attention."

"Control of information is absolutely critical for your campaign strategy. If you don't do enough research or on the right subjects, you're pretty much screwed. If you are directing your information at the wrong people, you lose. Find out who your people are, what they care about, where they live, and then get their asses to the polls." Josh shrugged. "This isn't rocket science. But for it to work, you need to do research. Research covers a lot of ground: polling, opposition research, issues research, media market research, election results for the last billion years, all of it."

He started writing on the board. "There are a few things to remember when putting together a research plan. First of all, your opponent will know everything there is to know about your record, and will attack any and all weaknesses. They will also--and this is important--attack your strengths and try to turn them into weaknesses. Therefore, you must also know everything there is to know about their record and be prepared to do the same thing, including attacking their strengths and turning them into weaknesses. Your ultimate goal is to have enough research, both on you and your opponent, that is comfortable and politically powerful for your guy while leaving the other guy uncomfortable and scrambling."

Josh sat down at his desk and took a sip of coffee. "Okay. For your pros, say you are a 5-term incumbent who is the chairman of, say, an Appropriations subcommittee. You've shuffled an awful lot of money back home. You've been representing your people for a decade and you've made a couple of votes where you've broken party lines to defend what your constituents believe about, oh, let's say the inheritance tax and torturing prisoners. For your cons, you're a Republican linked to a President whose approval ratings are made up of his immediate family."

He smiled. "How would you maximize your assets and minimize your weaknesses?"

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting